Search

New Lithium Battery Shipping Rules Mandatory August 7

Posted on 7/21/2015 by James Griffin

On August 6, 2014, PHMSA updated the lithium battery shipping provisions of the Hazardous Material Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR 171-180). The new lithium battery shipping rules more completely harmonize the US regulations with evolving international standards. While some dicrepancies remain, domestic and international rules for shipping lithium batteries are now more similar than ever.

Voluntary compliance with the new rules began immediately (Aug. 6, 2014), and the initial compliance deadline was 180 days after promulgation (Feb. 6, 2015). PHMSA later extended the deadline for shippers to August 7, 2015. Equivalent provisions for air and vessel shippers were part of the 56th Edition of IATA's Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR) and the 2014 Edition of the IMDG Code (Amendment 37). The IATA DGR rules have been in force since January 1 of this year, and mandatory compliance with the 2014 IMDG Code starts on January 1, 2016.

What Changed for Lithium Battery Shippers?

PHMSA's new lithium battery shipping regulations include three major components for lithium battery shippers:small lithium battery cell shipping regulations
  1. DOT added definitions of the terms "lithium ion cell or battery," "Lithium metal cell or battery," "short circuit," and "watt-hour" to the HMR at 49 CFR 171.8.
  2. DOT officially incorporated all six Proper Shipping Names and four identification numbers for lithium batteries into the Hazmat Table at 49 CFR 172.101, instead of operating under a conditional authorization in place since 2009.
  3. DOT reduced the multiplicity of special provisions that governed the transportation of "small" lithium batteries, placing those detailed provisions within the packing instructions for lithium batteries at 49 CFR 173.185.
DOT continues to provide additional relief from regulation for "medium"-sized lithium cells and batteries transported by ground in the United States. This exclusion goes beyond what is available in international codes. [49 CFR 173.185(c)(1)(iv)]

New Lithium Battery Communication & Marking Rules

There are two practices, currently recognized by DOT, that will no longer be available once mandatory compliance with the new rules starts on August 7, 2015:
  • Packing Group Assignments: Until now, lithium batteries were assigned to Packing Group II. This year, DOT and its international partners have eliminated packing group assignments for most articles, including lithium batteries. After August 6, 2015, US shippers may no longer indicate packing groups for lithium batteries on shipping papers or other communications.
  • Exclusions from alternate marking for large numbers of small batteries: Under Special Provision 188.f, DOT allowed shippers to avoid any labeling at all for packages that contained up to 12 small batteries or 24 small cells. Under the revised regulations, the only packages of lithium batteries that are excluded from on-package hazard communications are lithium batteries contained in equipment when there are no more than 2 batteries or 4 cells per package. [49 CFR 173.185(c)(3)]
This more complete harmonization between US DOT and international standards was made possible after international authorities agreed to prohibit most shipments of primary lithium metal cells and batteries from transport aboard passenger aircraft. [IATA DGR PI 968]

Lithium Battery Shippers: Be Ready on August 7

Be confident your site is ready to comply with the latest lithium battery shipping rules before the deadline. The Shipping Lithium Batteries Webinar covers the latest function-specific hazmat rules for shipping lithium batteries alone, in equipment, or with equipment. The interactive, instructor-led presentation will prepare you for compliance and will be presented next on August 4. Sign up now!

Tags: DOT, hazmat shipping, IATA, lithium batteries, marks and labels

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

Very well structured, comprehensive, and comparable to live training seminars I've participated in previously. I will recommend the online course to other colleagues with training requirement needs.

Neil Luciano

EHS Manager

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

Convenient; I can train when I want, where I want.

Barry Cook

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.

Brittany Holm

Lab Supervisor

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Get to know the top 5 changes to OSHA’s revised GHS Hazard Communication Standard at 29 CFR 1910.1200 and how the updates impacts employee safety at your facility.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.