Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 7/6

Posted on 7/6/2020 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts; chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.); hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA); and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A waste management facility
WHERE: Franklin, WI
WHAT: RCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $232,000

According to EPA, a waste management facility in Wisconsin improperly disposed of hazardous electric arc furnace dust from a steel casting foundry at a company-owned landfill on at least 10 days. The dust was contaminated with chromium, a hazardous waste and known human carcinogen. The facility was not to treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste.

Under the terms of the settlement, the facility has agreed to conduct leachate and groundwater monitoring as well as to update its waste management plan and training program. The settlement also includes a civil penalty of $232,000.
 
 

WHO: A seafood distributor
WHERE: Westport, WA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $190,000

A seafood distributor in the Pacific Northwest has settled with EPA over alleged Clean Water Act violations at one if its crab and shrimp processing facilities. EPA cited more than 2,100 alleged violations of the company’s wastewater discharge permit during a 2017 inspection. These include discharge limit violations, as well as violations related to monitoring frequency, incorrect sampling, and incomplete or inadequate reporting.

In addition to paying a fine, the company has launched a variety of new programs and implemented technologies to address compliance challenges at the Westport facility. As part of the agreement, the seafood distributor neither confirms nor denies EPA’s allegations.
 

WHO: A logistics company
WHERE: Lynden, WA
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $41,500

On March 9, 2020, EPA filed a consent agreement and final order resolving violations of the Clean Water Act by a Washington logistics company that warehouses perishable goods. According to EPA, the company allegedly discharged pollutants to Fishtrap Creek in violation of its Industrial Stormwater General Permit. Other alleged violations include failure to implement corrective action after benchmark exceedances, failure to document monthly inspections, failure to monitor, and an inadequate stormwater pollution prevention plan.

The company agreed in an administrative compliance order on consent to develop and implement multiple engineering plans that will reduce pollutants from leaving the facility and entering Fishtrap Creek. The company also agreed to pay a penalty of $41,500.

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 

Tags: Clean Water Act, environmental enforcement, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, RCRA, Washington, Wisconsin

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor made the class very enjoyable and catered to the needs of our group.

Sarah Baker

Planner

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

If I need thorough training or updating, I always use Lion. Lion is always the best in both instruction and materials.

Bryce Parker

EHS Manager

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

Lion was very extensive. There was a lot of things that were covered that were actually pertaining to what I do and work with. Great Job. I will be coming back in three years!

Tony Petrik

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The training was impressive. I am not a fan of online training but this was put together very well. I would recommend Lion to others.

Donnie James

Quality Manager

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

One of the best trainings I have ever received!

Brandon Morfin

EH&S Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Ace hazmat inspections. Protect personnel. Defend against civil and criminal penalties. How? See the self-audit "best practices" for hazardous materials shippers.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.