Lion.com will be briefly unavailable on Sunday, 12/22 between 6 and 8 PM ET for site maintenance.
Lion's office will be closed for the holidays on 12/25 and 12/26. Support for online training will be available by email (support@Lion.com) each day from 8:30 AM to 5 PM ET. 
Search

Comment Period Extended: Hazmat e-Communications

Posted on 8/26/2022 by Roger Marks

Update 08/26/22


US DOT PHMSA is extending the comment period for its notice requesting stakeholder input on potential benefits and drawbacks of electronic hazmat shipping papers, emergency response information, train consists, and other communications until October 24, 2022.
 
US DOT PHMSA invites hazardous materials shippers, carriers, emergency response organizations, and other stakeholders to share their thoughts about the potential for using electronic hazard communications as an alternative to the physical (i.e., paper) documentation currently required.

In the future, electronic communications could offer an alternative to the current hard-copy documentation requirements related to:
  • Hazmat shipping papers (49 CFR Part 172, Subpart C) 
  • Emergency response information (49 CFR 172, Subpart G)
  • Train consists (49 CFR 174.26) 
  • Notifications to the pilot in command (49 CFR 175.33) 
  • Dangerous cargo manifests (49 CFR 176.30) 
  • Shipping papers in motor vehicles (49 CFR 177.817) 

Electronic hazard communication could also affect DOT Special Permits (SPs), approvals, and registrations. DOT will accept comments on the Request for Information (RFI) until September 9 October 24, 2022.

Comments can be submitted online under the docket for “PHMSA Electronic Hazard Communication Project” at the regulations.gov website (Docket # PHMSA-2022-0043)

Comment Period Extended: Hazmat e-Communications

Questions for Hazmat Shippers

DOT poses two sets of questions in the RFI—one for shippers, transporters, and supply chain partners and one for emergency response and inspection organizations.

Some of the questions for shippers, transporters, and logistics facilitators to consider and comment on include (paraphrased):
  • Would you consider implementing electronic hazard communication if the HMR authorized it as an option?
  • What value could you gain by using electronic hazard communication?
  • Who should maintain and transmit the information—DOT/government, a third-party repository, an individual shipper/carrier based standard, or other?
  • Do you have concerns with DOT/other government agencies having permanent, historical access to the database, rather than access only during transportation?
  • To what extent would you participate in an electronic hazard communication alternative that was not fully multi-modal?
  • What if the electronic standard applied only to bulk transport of hazardous materials?
  • Should DOT prioritize electronic hazard communication for all quantities of hazardous materials shipments?
  • Do you anticipate resistance from others in the supply chain if you decide to adopt electronic hazard communication?
The RFI poses dozens of other questions and additional considerations for shippers and emergency response organizations to think about and comment on. The list of questions begins on page 41182 of the July 11 Federal Register.

Existing Electronic Hazard Communication Systems   

US EPA began phasing-in an electronic system for Hazardous Waste Manifests in 2018. Hazardous waste shipments make up a “small subset” of the 1.2 million hazmat shipments transported in the US every day, according to the PHMSA RFI.

In 2019, Transport Canada (in partnership with US DOT PHMSA) began a three-year “regulatory sandbox” to evaluate the feasibility of using electronic shipping documentation for the transport of dangerous goods. The pilot project involved rail carriers, highway carriers, and one aerial drone (UAS) carrier.

What Happens Next?

A request for information is a very early step in the rulemaking process. Public comments submitted in response to the RFI will provide PHMSA with insight into the regulatory community’s needs and concerns—and the potential challenges of implementing an electronic hazard communication system.

After the comment period closes, PHMSA may hold public meetings with stakeholders to further discuss a potential rule. Once they have considered stakeholder input, the next step is to publish an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM).

Lion News will track this activity and provide updates as the rulemaking process continues.

Upcoming Hazmat Training Workshops

Develop a step-by-step process to ship hazardous materials/dangerous goods by ground and air, in full compliance with US DOT and international regulations. These upcoming workshops are built to help satisfy 49 CFR (DOT) and IATA DGR training mandates for shippers and "hazmat employees."  
 
Hazmat Ground Shipper Certification (DOT)
Hazmat Air Shipper Certification (IATA) 

  Ground Shipper (DOT)          Air Shipper (IATA)
Nashville July 13–14 July 15
Dallas July 25–26 July 27
Orlando Aug. 3–4 Aug. 5
Houston Aug. 16–17 Aug. 18
Los Angeles          Sept. 14–15 Sept. 16
Chicago Oct. 5–6 Oct. 7
 

Later this year: Hazmat training workshops come to St. Louis, Atlanta, Philadelphia, and Hartford in Fall/Winter 2022. Find upcoming training at Lion.com/Hazmat

US DOT requires training once every 3 years for all hazmat employees (49 CFR 172.704).
For air shippers, the IATA DGR requires training once every 2 years (IATA DGR 1.5)


 

Tags: hazard communication, hazmat shipping, hazmat shipping papers

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

I have over 26 years of environmental compliance experience, and it has been some time since I have attended an environmental regulations workshop. I attended this course as preparation for EHS Audits for my six plants, and it was exactly what I was looking for.

Frank Sizemore

Director of Regulatory Affairs

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

I like the consistency of Lion workshops. The materials are well put together and instructors are top notch!

Kevin Pylka

Permitting, Compliance & Environmental Manager

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Decrease spill, release, and injury risk and increase savings with these "source reduction" strategies to prevent unused chemicals from becoming regulated as hazardous waste.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.