EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 12/6
Every day, facilities all across America receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations, hazardous waste management and disposal standards, and much more.
EPA raised its maximum civil penalties in 2016, making it more critical than ever that EHS professionals understand how these complex regulatory programs affect their facilities. We hope providing information about EPA enforcement cases will help you identify and fix noncompliance issues that could leave your company facing down costly penalties and future liability.
WHO: A major cruise ship operator
Note: This enforcement action was not taken by US EPA, but instead handed down by the US Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.
A Miami-based cruise ship company will pay $40 million to settle allegations the company illegally dumped oil and contaminated waste from one of its cruise ships off the coast of England. A new engineer with the ship noticed the violation while on board and reported it to the British Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), who in turn alerted the US Coast Guard.
In addition to the $40 million fine, the company will be under the watch of an Environmental Compliance Program (ECP), which requires a court-appointed monitor and independent audits by an outside entity. According to the DOJ press release, the ship illegally discharged about 4,227 gallons of oily waste.
WHO: An auto parts retailer
For failing to properly send hazardous waste for treatment and disposal as required under California’s Title 22 hazardous waste rules and the US EPA’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), an auto parts retailer will pay a $9,860,000 civil penalty.
Per a story in the East Bay Times, the retailer send used oil, oil filters, batteries, aerosol cans, and other hazardous wastes from more than 500 of its stores to a regular landfill instead of a hazardous waste disposal facility.
WHO: An oil and gas exploration company
An oil and gas exploration firm will pay a $2.1 million civil penalty and spend an additional $2 million on supplemental environmental projects to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act at 170 oil and natural gas well pads in North Dakota.
According to a US EPA press release, the company failed to control emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), a component of ozone, from its storage tanks.
Planning for next year? The 2017 schedule is available now and includes a workshop in our new Environmental Training Center in Sparta, NJ! Register to receive a full year of Lion Membership for complete on-the-job compliance support.
EPA raised its maximum civil penalties in 2016, making it more critical than ever that EHS professionals understand how these complex regulatory programs affect their facilities. We hope providing information about EPA enforcement cases will help you identify and fix noncompliance issues that could leave your company facing down costly penalties and future liability.
WHO: A major cruise ship operator
WHERE: Miami, FL
WHAT: Illegal discharge of oily waste
HOW MUCH: $40 million
Note: This enforcement action was not taken by US EPA, but instead handed down by the US Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.A Miami-based cruise ship company will pay $40 million to settle allegations the company illegally dumped oil and contaminated waste from one of its cruise ships off the coast of England. A new engineer with the ship noticed the violation while on board and reported it to the British Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), who in turn alerted the US Coast Guard.
In addition to the $40 million fine, the company will be under the watch of an Environmental Compliance Program (ECP), which requires a court-appointed monitor and independent audits by an outside entity. According to the DOJ press release, the ship illegally discharged about 4,227 gallons of oily waste.
WHO: An auto parts retailer
WHERE: Alameda County, CA
WHAT: RCRA hazardous waste violations
HOW MUCH: $9.9 million
For failing to properly send hazardous waste for treatment and disposal as required under California’s Title 22 hazardous waste rules and the US EPA’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), an auto parts retailer will pay a $9,860,000 civil penalty.Per a story in the East Bay Times, the retailer send used oil, oil filters, batteries, aerosol cans, and other hazardous wastes from more than 500 of its stores to a regular landfill instead of a hazardous waste disposal facility.
WHO: An oil and gas exploration company
WHERE: North Dakota
WHAT: Failure to control vapor emissions of VOCs from storage tanks
HOW MUCH: $2.1 million
An oil and gas exploration firm will pay a $2.1 million civil penalty and spend an additional $2 million on supplemental environmental projects to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Air Act at 170 oil and natural gas well pads in North Dakota.According to a US EPA press release, the company failed to control emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), a component of ozone, from its storage tanks.
Complete EPA Regulations Workshops – 2017 Schedule Now Available!
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, FIFRA, EPCRA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop will help you identify the requirements that apply to your facility and make decisions that put your team in a position to succeed.Planning for next year? The 2017 schedule is available now and includes a workshop in our new Environmental Training Center in Sparta, NJ! Register to receive a full year of Lion Membership for complete on-the-job compliance support.
Tags: Act, Air, Clean, Clean Water Act, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, fines and penalties
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? The four fundamental concepts in this guide are the place to start.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.