Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 12/16

Posted on 12/17/2019 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities across the US receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations (TSCA, EPCRA, CERCLA, etc.), hazardous waste management and disposal standards (RCRA), and much more.

Below are examples of recent EPA enforcement actions that provide insight into how and why EPA issues civil penalties to facilities for environmental noncompliance. Names of companies and individuals cited by EPA are withheld to protect their privacy.
 

WHO: A hydrocarbon exploration company
WHERE: Creede, CO
WHAT: CERCLA violations
HOW MUCH: $5.77 million plus $425,000 in Federal agency reimbursements

EPA has settled with a national drilling and excavation company for their operations at the Nelson Tunnel/Commodore Waste Rock Pile Superfund Site. The multi-million-dollar settlement requires the company to reimburse the US and its Federal agencies for costs incurred for response and cleanup at the site.

EPA alleges that the company disposed of hazardous waste at the former mining site with the possibility of release into the environment and nearby waterways.

Do you work at a Superfund site or other “uncontrolled hazardous waste site”? Keep your HAZWOPER training up to date with the convenient, interactive HAZWOPER 8-Hour Refresher Online Course.
 

WHO: A chain of autobody shops
WHERE: 11 CA counties
WHAT: RCRA and Title 22 violations
HOW MUCH: $2.35 million

District Attorneys from 11 California Counties filed a joint suit against an autobody chain for their alleged illegal hazardous waste disposal operations in the Golden State. They allege that the company improperly disposed of large quantities of sanding dust, sanding pads, automotive paints, solvents, non-empty aerosol cans, and other hazardous substances as well as confidential customer information.

The agreement calls for $500,000 on new equipment to limit the release of hazardous wastes and help recycle solvents, and wastewater. The company must also hire a full-time employee to oversee environmental compliance at their 42 locations throughout the state.
 

WHO: An oil refinery
WHERE: Bakersfield, CA
WHAT: Clean Air Act and EPCRA violations
HOW MUCH: $500,000 plus $200,000 in supplemental environmental projects

A California oil refinery reached an agreement with EPA and DTSC officials for their alleged failures to meet new source performance standards under the Clean Air Act as well as hazardous substance reporting requirements under EPCRA.

The $500,000 fine will be split between the US and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District. The oil refinery must also invest at least $200,000 in two supplemental environmental projects to purchase and operate an infrared gas-imaging camera and purchase emergency responder equipment for local firefighters and first responders.
 

Convenient, Effective Online EHS Manager Training

Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, online training is a convenient way to quickly build in-depth expertise.

Check out the latest EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 
The 2020 nationwide schedule  for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is available online. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
 

Tags: California, CERCLA, Clean Air Act, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, EPCRA, fines, hazardous waste, penalties, RCRA, Superfund

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

The instructor was very patient and engaging - willing to answer and help explain subject matter.

Misty Filipp

Material Control Superintendent

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

The course was very well structured and covered the material in a clear, concise manner.

Ian Martinez

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

The online course was well thought out and organized, with good interaction between the student and the course.

Larry Ybarra

Material Release Agent

More thorough than a class I attended last year through another company.

Troy Yonkers

HSES Representative

The instructor was probably the best I ever had! He made the class enjoyable, was humorous at times, and very knowledgeable.

Mary Sue Michon

Environmental Administrator

Our instructor was very dynamic and kept everyone's interest. Hazmat shipping can be a dry, complicated topic but I was engaged the entire time.

Kimberly Arnao

Senior Director of EH&S

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Use this guide to spot which tanks and substances are regulated under EPA's Underground Storage Tank program, and which are excluded as of October 2018.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.