Lion's office will be closed for the holidays on 12/25 and 26. Online training support is available by email (support@Lion.com) each day from 8:30 AM to 5 PM ET. 
Search

EPA Releases Final TSCA Risk Eval for Perchloroethylene

Posted on 12/15/2020 by Roger Marks

Update 07/07/2022
EPA is working to revise many of the TSCA chemical risk determinations completed in 2020. A draft of the revised PCE Risk Determination was announced on June 30, 2022. EPA will accept public comments on the draft revision until August 1. 

US EPA released the results of its chemical risk evaluations for Perchloroethylene (PCE) on December 14, 2020.

EPA analyzed conditions of the chemical’s use across manufacturing, processing, industrial/commercial uses, consumer uses, and disposal. Of the sixty-one conditions of use EPA evaluated, fifty-nine of them posed unreasonable risks to workers, occupational non-users, consumers, and bystanders—including disposal of PCE.

EPA concluded that PCE poses an environmental hazard to aquatic life. To evaluate the risk posed to the environment, EPA studied 199 different types of releases and modeled surface water concentrations of PCE.

EPA Releases Final TSCA Risk Eval for Perchloroethylene

What is Perchloroethylene (PCE)?

Perchloroethylene or PCE (CASRN 127-18-4) is a nonflammable colorless liquid with the molecular formula C2Cl4.

The most common use of PCE is in the production of fluorinated compounds (e.g., HFCs and HCFCs) for industrial gas manufacturing. It is also used as a solvent in dry cleaning and degreasing. Commercial and consumer products that contain PCE include adhesives, brake cleaners, aerosol lubricants, and sealants. PCE is also used in cleaning products like stone polish and stainless-steel polish.

Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) data submitted by chemical manufacturers and importers in 2016 show yearly aggregate production of between 324 and 388 million pounds between 2012 and 2015.

What is a TSCA Chemical Risk Evaluation?

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act for the 21st Century (LCSA) amended TSCA in 2016. The amended law requires EPA to evaluate the risks of all chemicals on the TSCA inventory. EPA is expected to be at work on twenty chemical risk evaluations at any given time. 

The TSCA risk evaluation for PCE is the latest sign of EPA’ steady progress in meeting their statutory responsibilities. In the past six months, EPA has released final risk evaluations for Carbon Tetrachloride, HBCD, 1-bromopropane, trichloroethylene (TCE). and Methylene Chloride.

What Will EPA Do Next?

Once EPA identifies unreasonable risk to human health or the environment for a chemical, TSCA (as amended) requires the EPA to establish regulations to mitigate or remove the unreasonable risk.

The agency’s next step is to write those regulations, which could impose limits on manufacturing, processing, using, storing, or disposing of the chemical. As with most environmental regulations, the EPA will have to publish a proposed version of the rule first and open up public comment before revising and promulgating the final rule.

LCSA allows the EPA two years from the publication of the final risk evaluation to complete the risk management portion of the process.

Since the final risk evaluation of PCE was published on December 14, 2020, the risk management regulations for PCE should be promulgated no later than December 14, 2022.

Master TSCA Chemical Management and Reporting

Be confident you know how the Lautenberg Law impacts your responsibilities for chemical management, chemical inventory reporting, and recordkeeping under TSCA.

The TSCA Regulations Online Course guides you through your responsibilities under EPA's latest regulations. 

Tags: chemical risk evaluation, TSCA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

As always, Lion never disappoints

Paul Resley

Environmental Coordinator

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

The instructor was great, explaining complex topics in terms that were easily understandable and answering questions clearly and thoroughly.

Brittany Holm

Lab Supervisor

Excellent class, super instructor, very easy to follow. No rushing through material. Would like to take his class again.

Lawrence Patterson

EH&S Facility Maintenance & Security Manager

I was recently offered an opportunity to take my training through another company, but I politely declined. I only attend Lion Technology workshops.

Stephanie Gilliam

Material Production/Logistics Manager

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

The course is well thought out and organized in a way that leads to a clearer understanding of the total training.

David Baily

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

I tried other environmental training providers, but they were all sub-standard compared to Lion. I will not stray from Lion again!

Sara Sills

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Just starting out with shipping lithium batteries? The four fundamental concepts in this guide are the place to start.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.