EPA Enforcement Roundup: Valentine's Day Edition
Tomorrow is Valentine's Day and EPA has dished out some tough love lately for alleged criminal and civil violations of environmental law and regulations.
These are only some of the cases we’ve read about in the last 30 days. See EPA Enforcement actions that colleagues can learn from? Post them on Lion’s Facebook page here. Don’t forget to like Lion’s page so you never miss an update about DOT hazmat, hazardous waste, OSHA workplace safety, and EPA compliance.
In last week’s EPA Enforcement Roundup, A California wine maker, a coke plant in Indiana, and a manufacturer in New York all paid dearly for alleged EPA violations.
For criminal EPA violations include conspiracy to violate the Clean Water Act, a Delaware-based used oil processor will pay a $1.3 million criminal penalty and fork over $2.2 million in restitution to the City of Wilmington. According to EPA and a US District Court Judge, the company tampered with monitoring devices and monthly samples required under the Clean Water Act and the facility’s pretreatment permit.
In addition, the company violated RCRA hazardous waste standards (and, incidentally, US DOT hazmat shipping rules) when it trucked disposal sludge from storage tanks containing benzene, barium, chromium, cadmium, lead, PCE, and TCE. The company shipped the waste without providing a Hazardous Waste Manifest for the shipment.
A seed company and food grower operating in Hawaii is under fire for failure to provide proper hazard communication and pesticide training required to protect workers who apply and work around dangerous restricted-use pesticides or RUPs.
The company allegedly failed to notify workers “verbally and with signage” to avoid recently-treated fields. As a result, workers were exposed to pesticides and some were hospitalized. The company also failed to provide adequate decontamination equipment for workers and even failed to transport affected workers to a medical facility promptly.
A southwest Ohio city has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $55,000 for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. EPA says that the city discharged untreated sewage into two bodies of water. On top of the civil penalty, the city will spend $200,000 to protect aquatic life from contaminated sediments in the water.
Also, the city will improve its sewer system and sewage treatment plant to reduce the frequency and volume of untreated sewer overflows.
You get access to fully annotated resources trusted by professionals in the field since 1977. Plus, earn CEUs and leave with a full year of Lion Membership for fast answers to your questions, exclusive content and reference materials, State hazardous waste summaries, and more.
If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.
Or, check out the latest individual EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Join us live! The 2018 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
These are only some of the cases we’ve read about in the last 30 days. See EPA Enforcement actions that colleagues can learn from? Post them on Lion’s Facebook page here. Don’t forget to like Lion’s page so you never miss an update about DOT hazmat, hazardous waste, OSHA workplace safety, and EPA compliance.
In last week’s EPA Enforcement Roundup, A California wine maker, a coke plant in Indiana, and a manufacturer in New York all paid dearly for alleged EPA violations.
WHO: A petroleum processor
WHERE: Wilmington, DE
WHAT: Criminal Clean Water Act Violations, more
HOW MUCH: $3,500,000
For criminal EPA violations include conspiracy to violate the Clean Water Act, a Delaware-based used oil processor will pay a $1.3 million criminal penalty and fork over $2.2 million in restitution to the City of Wilmington. According to EPA and a US District Court Judge, the company tampered with monitoring devices and monthly samples required under the Clean Water Act and the facility’s pretreatment permit.In addition, the company violated RCRA hazardous waste standards (and, incidentally, US DOT hazmat shipping rules) when it trucked disposal sludge from storage tanks containing benzene, barium, chromium, cadmium, lead, PCE, and TCE. The company shipped the waste without providing a Hazardous Waste Manifest for the shipment.
WHO: A global agriculture firm
WHERE: Kekaha, HI
WHAT: Violations of FIFRA pesticides worker protections
HOW MUCH: $550,000
A seed company and food grower operating in Hawaii is under fire for failure to provide proper hazard communication and pesticide training required to protect workers who apply and work around dangerous restricted-use pesticides or RUPs.The company allegedly failed to notify workers “verbally and with signage” to avoid recently-treated fields. As a result, workers were exposed to pesticides and some were hospitalized. The company also failed to provide adequate decontamination equipment for workers and even failed to transport affected workers to a medical facility promptly.
WHO: City of Middletown, Ohio
WHERE: Middletown, OH
WHAT: Clean Water Act violations
HOW MUCH: $255,000
A southwest Ohio city has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $55,000 for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. EPA says that the city discharged untreated sewage into two bodies of water. On top of the civil penalty, the city will spend $200,000 to protect aquatic life from contaminated sediments in the water.Also, the city will improve its sewer system and sewage treatment plant to reduce the frequency and volume of untreated sewer overflows.
On-demand RCRA, RCRA Refresher, and EPA Compliance Training
Complete your annual RCRA training and get up to speed on the latest rules for hazardous waste generators at Lion.com. Build on your expertise with a streamlined RCRA refresher course you can access anytime, anywhere.You get access to fully annotated resources trusted by professionals in the field since 1977. Plus, earn CEUs and leave with a full year of Lion Membership for fast answers to your questions, exclusive content and reference materials, State hazardous waste summaries, and more.
20+ Hours of EHS Manager Training - Available Anytime, Anywhere
Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge.If you’re new to the field or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.
Or, check out the latest individual EPA compliance training options here:
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online
Join us live! The 2018 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
Tags: Act, Clean, EPA, EPA Enforcement Roundup, FIFRA, fines and penalties, RCRA, Water
Find a Post
Recent Posts
Compliance Archives
Download Our Latest Whitepaper
Your hazmat paperwork is the first thing a DOT inspector will ask for during an inspection. From hazmat training records to special permits, make sure your hazmat documents are in order.
By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.