Lion.com will be briefly unavailable on Sunday, 12/22 between 6 and 8 PM ET for site maintenance.
Lion's office will be closed for the holidays on 12/25 and 12/26. Support for online training will be available by email (support@Lion.com) each day from 8:30 AM to 5 PM ET. 
Search

Supremes Relegate WOTUS Argument to District Courts

Posted on 1/25/2018 by Roger Marks

UPDATED 02/06/18: In the Federal Regsiter today, US EPA offiically added a new applicability date of February 6, 2020 to the 2015 Waters of the United States or WOTUS Rule, which is currently undergoing recodification. 

UPDATED 02/01/18: After the Supreme Court effectively lifted a nationwide ban on enforcement of EPA's 2015 Waters of the United States or WOTUS Rule, on January 31 EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt officially signed a rule to delay the new Clean Water Act standard until 2020. 

This week, the US Supreme Court decided unanimously not to take up a challenge to EPA’s 2015 Waters of the United States, or WOTUS, Final Rule. Instead, the Court held that challenges to the Final Rule—which expanded the Agency’s authority to enforce the Clean Water Act by more broadly interpreting the term “navigable waters”—must be brought in district courts.  

This means that future challenges to EPA’s WOTUS Final Rule may be filed and taken up in any or all of the nation’s ninety-four district courts. It also means that each of those ninety-four district courts could come to a unique conclusion about EPA’s rule. 


Background on EPA’s WOTUS Final Rule

water3.jpgThe Supreme Court’s WOTUS decision is only the latest headline in an ongoing saga concerning US EPA’s attempts to broaden the applicability of Clean Water Act regulations. In September 2015, one day before the WOTUS Final Rule was to take effect, a Federal Judge in North Dakota issued an injunction to block the rule from taking effect in 13 states until the court cases could be heard and settled.

The following month, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a nationwide Order of Stay on the WOTUS Final Rule, effectively preventing EPA from enforcing the rule, pending the result of legal challenges.


EPA’s Reconsideration of WOTUS

As the Obama-era WOTUS Final Rule is tied up in courts, the current administration has already pledged to reconsider and recodify the Final Rule. Reconsideration of the Final Rule came in response to an Executive Order issued on February 28, 2017.  

These are parallel efforts: As groups challenge EPA’s authority to enforce the 2015 Rule on administrative grounds in the courts, the new guard at EPA is working to replace the 2015 Rule with a (presumably) less expansive regulation of their own. A new Rule, of course, could lead to a new court battle, and so on.


What Does SCOTUS Decision Mean for Future of WOTUS?

EPA_Logo_Gavel.pngThe Supreme Court’s decision strikes down the Circuit Court’s nationwide stay, holding that district courts—not Appeals courts—are the appropriate venue for challenges to the WOTUS rule to be heard, based on Clean Water Act statute. Requiring the case to be taken up by district courts may open the door for regional or state-by-state injunctions to block EPA from enforcing the Final Rule.

The Supremes’ decision was primarily a jurisdictional one. WOTUS watchers hoping for more insight into how EPA will define Waters of the United States in the future will not find it here. For that, we will have to wait until US district courts to have their say or until EPA proposes a new WOTUS rule later this year, as expected. 


What Is the WOTUS Rule?

How EPA defines “waters of the United States” is critical to enforcement of the nation’s water laws. This definition tells the regulated community which bodies of water—oceans, lakes, rivers, streams, creeks, swamps, and more—are subject to the requirements of the Clean Water Act.

The definition of WOTUS impacts the way EPA enforces the myriad Clean Water Act programs: Oil spill notification (40 CFR 110), SPCC Plans (40 CFR 112), NPDES permitting and stormwater discharges (40 CFR 122), the per-industry standards at 40 CFR 405–471, and dredge and fill permitting (33 CFR 323).


EPA Compliance Training—Anytime, Anywhere

computer-(1).jpgManaging site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, EPCRA, CERLCA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Online Course will help you quickly build in-depth expertise.

Or, check out the latest individual EPA compliance training options here:
 
Clean Air Act Regulations Online
TSCA Regulations Online
New! Clean Water Act & SDWA Regulations Online
Just Launched! Superfund and Right-to-Know Act Regulations Online 
 
The 2017 nationwide schedule for the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop is now available. Collaborate with other managers to identify the requirements that apply to your facility, ask the right questions, and make the right decisions about EPA compliance.
 

Tags: Act, Clean, effluent, EPA, new rules, NPDES, Water

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

The price was reasonable, the time to complete the course was manageable, and the flexibility the online training allowed made it easy to complete.

Felicia Rutledge

Hazmat Shipping Professional

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

The instructor was very engaging and helped less experienced people understand the concepts.

Steve Gall

Safety Leader

The exercises in the DOT hazardous materials management course are especially helpful in evaluating your understanding of course information.

Morgan Bliss

Principal Industrial Hygienist

No comparison. Lion has the best RCRA training ever!!

Matt Sabine

Environmental Specialist

I really enjoy your workshops. Thank you for such a great program and all the help Lion has provided me over the years!

George Chatman

Hazardous Material Pharmacy Technician

The instructor had knowledge of regulations and understanding of real-world situations. The presentation style was engaging and fostered a positive atmosphere for information sharing.

Linda Arlen

Safety & Environmental Compliance Officer

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

Well designed and thorough program. Excellent summary of requirements with references. Inclusion of regulations in hard copy form, as well as full electronic with state pertinent regulations included is a great bonus!

Oscar Fisher

EHS Manager

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Use this guide to spot which tanks and substances are regulated under EPA's Underground Storage Tank program, and which are excluded as of October 2018.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.