Lion.com will be briefly unavailable on Sunday, 12/22 between 6 and 8 PM ET for site maintenance.
Lion's office will be closed for the holidays on 12/25 and 12/26. Support for online training will be available by email (support@Lion.com) each day from 8:30 AM to 5 PM ET. 
Search

Update: Criminal Charges in 2019 Plant Explosion Case

Posted on 5/30/2024 by Nick Waldron and Roger Marks

Update, 5/30/2024:

Five years ago, a petrochemical plant in Texas exploded, causing $603 million in damages. On May 21, 2024, US EPA and the US Department of Justice announced the filing of a felony criminal charge and related civil complaint and consent decree under the Clean Air Act against the company that owns the plant.

The company has agreed to pay $18 million in criminal fines, $12.1 million in civil penalties, and $80 million to improve safety at its facilities. The civil complaint includes more than 50 claims and counts against the company between its Port Neches facility—where the explosions took place—and Houston facility.

Clean Air Act regulations require planning to prevent accidental releases of hazardous chemicals, and implementation of those plans is mandatory. The company pleaded guilty to knowingly failing to implement its own written operating procedures, including monthly flushing of production lines that would have prevented the explosion.


CSB Video: The Danger of Popcorn Polymer


Original Article, 1/5/2023:

At a chemical plant in Texas, pressure buildup causes a pipe to rupture. Within minutes, six thousand gallons of flammable butadiene gas leaks from the pipe, vaporizes, ignites, and explodes. A series of explosions follow that cause $583 million in damages to the plant and the surrounding area. 

The incident described happened in the city of Port Neches on the night before Thanksgiving in 2019. In December 2022, the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) issued a final Investigation Report focused on the accident that includes safety recommendations and key lessons for industry. 

The pipe that burst was 35 feet long and closed off at one end. The pressure buildup was caused by “popcorn polymer”—also known as crystalline polybutadiene—that can rapidly accumulate inside of equipment that handles high-purity butadiene. 

Update: Criminal Charges in 2019 Plant Explosion Case

Dangers of "Dead Legs" in Process Equipment 

Some recommendations in CSB's Final Report relate to dead legs—sections of pipe or equipment that are not in use (permanently or temporarily), in which hazardous chemicals, chemical vapors, or water can accumulate. If these "dead leg" areas are not addressed when processing high-purity butadiene (as in this case), popcorn polymer can “grow” unnoticed. The substance expands and accumulates in a chain reaction until the pipe or vessel ruptures.

3 Key Lessons for Industry

The Final Investigation Report on the Port Neches, TX butadiene incident includes three “key lessons for industry.” CSB provides some practical guidance about implementing these lessons learned, and puts forth five safety recommendations in the full report linked above. 

1. Companies should establish a process to identify, control, or eliminate dead legs in operations susceptible to popcorn polymer formation...
2. …Butadiene facilities should develop robust policies to prevent and control popcorn polymer development and growth based on industry guidance, such as thorough equipment passivation, controlling oxygen levels, through chemical inhibitors, and other best practice methods.
3. Companies that handle large inventories of flammable or toxic material should assess their capability to remotely isolate these inventories in the event of a loss of process containment.
 

Alleged OSHA Violations

OSHA inspected the facility after the incident and cited the employer for two willful violations of the Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard related to the explosion and fire:

  • Failure to implement adequate process safety procedures [(29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1))], and
  • Not correct deficiencies in equipment to assure safe operations [(29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5)]

OSHA also cited the employer for violating the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act of 1970 (Section (5)(a)(1)), which requires employers to provide a workplace free of recognized hazards that are likely to cause death, or serious physical harm.

For these violations, the owners of the facility faced more $500,000 civil penalties. As of January 2022, the maximum monetary penalty for each “willful violation” is about $145,000.

Updating the PSM Standard

OSHA held a public meeting with stakeholders late last year to discuss an ongoing rulemaking project to "modernize" the Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard in 29 CFR 1910.1119 (Details).  

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I like the consistency of Lion workshops. The materials are well put together and instructors are top notch!

Kevin Pylka

Permitting, Compliance & Environmental Manager

Lion does a great job summarizing and communicating complicated EH&S-related regulations.

Michele Irmen

Sr. Environmental Engineer

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

The instructor was very very informative, helpful, understandable and pleasant. This course answered many questions I had, being new to this industry.

Frances Mona

Shipping Manager

These are the best commercial course references I have seen (10+ years). Great job!

Ed Grzybowski

EHS & Facility Engineer

This was the 1st instructor that has made the topic actually enjoyable and easy to follow and understand. Far better than the "other" training providers our company has attended!

Lori Hardy

Process & Resource Administrator

Attending Lion Technology classes should be mandatory for every facility that ships or stores hazmat.

Genell Drake

Outbound Lead

The instructor was very dedicated to providing a quality experience. She did her best to make sure students were really comprehending the information.

Stephanie Venn

Inventory Control Specialist

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This report details major changes for hazardous waste generators from US EPA’s Generator Improvements Rule, as well as the latest updates from states that are still working to adopt new, stricter Federal requirements.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.