Search

[Video] Designed to Fail: Key Lessons from an Acetic Acid Release

Posted on 7/15/2024 by Lion Technology Inc.

On July 27, 2021, three contractors removed an actuator from an acetic acid reactor. The contractors inadvertently removed nuts that held a pressure-retaining valve cover in place.

The workers used a pry bar to try to remove the coupler from the valve stem, and the forces from the pry bar and the process fluid pressure inside the plug valve caused the unfastened valve cover and plug to eject from the plug valve body. Roughly 164,000 pounds of a 61.7% acetic acid mixture at 238 °F rapidly released from the open plug valve.

Two of the contract workers died from fatal chemical burns and inhalation. The other contract worker, and 28 other workers, sought medical treatment.

The United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB, or “the Board”) investigates safety incidents and makes recommendations based on its findings. See its findings and recommendations in the Board's video below.

CSB Video: Designed to Fail

See US CSB's final report.

Four Key Lessons for the Industry

1. This isn't the first time.

"Multiple incidents have occurred in the chemical industry where employees have inadvertently removed pressure-retaining bolts from plug valves when attempting to remove actuating equipment. This has led to plug valves coming apart, releases of hazardous materials, and serious injuries and worker fatalities."

2. Design helps prevent human error.

"To prevent future incidents in which workers inadvertently remove pressure-retaining components from plug valves while attempting to remove actuating equipment, facilities should clearly mark or identify pressure-retaining bolts on existing plug valves, for example through color coding techniques and/or warning labels or signs."

3. Procedures help workers work safely.

"Facilities with plug valves should develop formal procedures for the removal of plug valve actuating equipment that require (1) a risk assessment of all plug valve actuator removal work to ensure sufficient procedures and safeguards are in place to prevent worker exposure to process fluid; (2) written procedures detailing actuator removal steps for the specific valve design; and (3) workers to be trained on the procedure before conducting the actuator removal work."

4. Contractors should be supervised.

"When contractors are conducting work on or near plant equipment containing hazardous materials, it is critical for the operating company to oversee the contractor work and ensure that it is conducted in a safe manner."

[Video] Designed to Fail: Key Lessons from an Acetic Acid Release

Takeaway: Stronger PSM and HazCom Compliance

This incident highlights how critical compliance with OSHA’s Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard and Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) are for keeping workers safe.

The PSM Standard exists to prevent or minimize the consequences of catastrophic releases of hazardous chemicals. Employees working at covered facilities must be trained “in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures” that emphasizes safety and health standards, emergency operations (including emergency shut down), and safe work practices [1910.119(g)(1)(i)].

Without adequate training and information about hazardous chemicals on site, employees may not take what could be life-saving precautions. In this instance, both companies perceived the task as simple. That perception, the lack of training for contracted workers, and unmarked pressure-retaining hardware resulted in the death of two workers and medical treatment for thirty others.

Tags: Chemical safety, CSB, hazard communication, HazCom, OSHA compliance, process safety management

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

The course was very informative and presented in a way that was easily understood and remembered. I would recommend this course.

Jeffrey Tierno

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I love that the instructor emphasized the thought process behind the regs.

Rebecca Saxena

Corporate Product Stewardship Specialist

Lion is easily and consistently the best option for compliance training. I've learned new information from every instructor I've had.

Rachel Mathis

EHS Specialist

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

Excellent course. Very interactive. Explanations are great whether you get the questions wrong or right.

Gregory Thompson

Environmental, Health & Safety Regional Manager

Best course instructor I've ever had. Funny, relatable, engaging; made it interesting and challenged us as the professionals we are.

Amanda Schwartz

Environmental Coordinator

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor clearly enjoys his job and transmits that enthusiasm. He made a dry subject very interesting and fun.

Teresa Arellanes

EHS Manager

I was able to present my scenario to the instructor and worked thru the regulations together. In the past, I attended another training firm's classes. Now, I have no intention of leaving Lion!

Diana Joyner

Senior Environmental Engineer

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

Hazardous materials shipment rejections bear a big cost. Use this guide to end operational and logistical disruptions that severely impact your bottom line.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.