Lion.com will be unavailable briefly between 12 AM and 2 AM ET on Saturday, 3/15 for scheduled maintenance. For help with online training, please email support@Lion.com. 
Search

EPA Goes Back-to-Basics on NAAQS Reviews

Posted on 5/11/2018 by Roger Marks

power_plant_cleanpowerplan.gifCurrent US EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on May 9th signed a memorandum establishing a “back-to-basics” approach to Clean Air Act-required reviews of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The memo, inspired by an April 12 Presidential memorandum to EPA, lays out five principles to guide EPA’s decision making pursuant to these air quality standards.


What Are NAAQS?

Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to set maximum allowable levels for six criteria pollutants in the ambient air: ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, lead, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. In areas where the pollution level rises above the NAAQS, facilities face more stringent requirements for building or modifying sources of air pollution.

The Clean Air Act also requires EPA to review these NAAQS levels every five years and adjust them, if necessary. Each time US EPA updates its NAAQs requirements for a given pollutant—as the Agency did for ozone on October 1, 2015—the update triggers a reassessment of regional attainment status. States must determine which regions attain the updated standard and which don’t and submit the data to US EPA.

EPA must complete the area designations within two years once the Agency updates any NAAQS.


5 Principles for Back-to-Basics NAAQS Reviews

The NAAQS memo lists five back-to-basics principles for EPA to follow to improve the NAAQS review process.
 
  1. Meet Statutory Deadlines. EPA will look for efficiencies to expediate the review process, which often drags on past the time limits mandated by law. EPA was sued in March 2018 for failure to complete area designations for its lowered ozone NAAQS, for example.

  2. Address All CAA Provisions for NAAQS Reviews. EPA specifically calls attention to Section 109(d)(2), which outlines the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Council’s role for providing advice and feedback on NAAQS standards. Pruitt’s memo states that EPA has not always met its full responsibilities under this section in previous NAAQS reviews.

  3. Streamline and Standardize the Process for Development and Review of Key Policy-relevant Information. EPA plans to improve its review of “policy-relevant science,” studies, and analyses “that address key questions related to the adequacy of primary and secondary NAAQS.”

  4. Differentiate Science and Policy Considerations in NAAQS Review Process. EPA wants to better distinguish between “science advice” and “policy advice” received from advisors and more clearly separate the pure science from the additional considerations—social, economic, etc.—that the Administrator considers before approving any NAAQS action.

  5. Issue Timely Implementation Regulations and Guidance. EPA pledges to do a better job of releasing guidance and information pursuant to changing NAAQS rules to the regulated community and State agencies.
Read the whole memo here.


Clean Air Act Online Trainingair-pollution.jpg

Are you responsible for Clean Air Act compliance? New to EPA regulations or need to identify the air programs that impact your facility? The Clean Air Act Regulations Online Course will guide you through the complex details and requirements of each Clean Air Act program, preparing you to achieve and maintain compliance, and avoid EPA fines now up to $95K per day, per violation.
 

Tags: back, basics, Clean Air Act, EPA, NAAQS, new rules, to

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

I attended training from another provider and learned absolutely nothing. Lion is much better. Hands down.

Nicole Eby

Environmental Specialist

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

Course instructor was better prepared and presented better than other trainers. Course manual and references were easier to use as well.

Marty Brownfield

Hazardous Waste Professional

My experience with Lion training, both online and in the classroom, is that they are far better organized and provide a better sequential explanation of the material.

Robert Roose

Manager, Dangerous Goods Transportation

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

Much better than my previous class with another company. The Lion instructor made sense, kept me awake and made me laugh!

Marti Severs

Enterprise Safety Manager

The instructor did an excellent job presenting a very dry subject; keeping everyone interested and making it enjoyable.

Marc Bugg

Hazardous Waste Professional

The instructor does a great job at presenting material in an approachable way. I have been able to save my company about $30,000 in the last year with what I have learned from Lion!

Curtis Ahonen

EHS&S Manager

The instructor's energy, enthusiasm, and knowledge of the subject make the class a great learning experience!

Brian Martinez

Warehouse Operator

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

In most cases, injuries that occur at work are work-related and must be recorded to maintain compliance with OSHA regulations. This report shows you the 9 types of injuries you don’t record.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.