Search

EPA Enforcement Roundup: Week of 11/15

Posted on 11/15/2016 by Lauren Scott

Every day, facilities all across America receive Notices of Violation from US EPA for alleged noncompliance with a wide variety of programs like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, chemical management and reporting regulations, hazardous waste management and disposal standards, and much more.

EPA raised its maximum civil penalties in 2016, making it more critical than ever that EHS professionals understand how these complex regulatory programs affect their facilities. We hope providing information about EPA enforcement cases will help you identify and fix noncompliance issues that could leave your company facing down costly penalties and future liability.
 

WHO: A railcar cleaning company
WHERE: Omaha, NE
WHAT: An Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Administrative Order for continued failure to comply with RCRA hazardous waste rules.
HOW MUCH: Up to $14,023 per violation if the company fails to comply

 
Under a newly issued Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Administrative Order, a rail car cleaning company in Nebraska must take immediate steps to protect human health and the environment after EPA site inspections found the company failed to identify, handle, and dispose of its hazardous waste in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.  

US Environmental Protection Agency logoThe company must now manage its hazardous wastes—about 10.000 lbs. per month combined of solid crude oil, liquid crude oil, ethanol and methanol according to EPA—in compliance with RCRA. In addition, the company must provide reports to EPA of the hazardous waste determinations and disposal practices.
 

WHO: A major petroleum refiner
WHERE: Lemont, Illinois
WHAT: Clean Air Act violations
HOW MUCH: $1,955,000 + $42 million in injunctive relief

 
For violations of the Clean Air Act, one of the nation’s largest providers of petrochemicals will pay nearly $2 million in civil penalties and spend an additional $42 million in injunctive relief. In addition to violating the Clean Air Act, the operations at the Lemont, Illinois refinery did not comply with the company’s global refinery consent decree reached in 2004.

Among the violations listed by EPA are noncompliance with New Source Review permitting requirements, failure to adequately eliminate or control emissions, failure to continuously monitor emissions, and violating the Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC.
 

WHO: The city of Industry, California
WHERE: Industry, CA
WHAT: Illegal dredging under the Clean Water Act
HOW MUCH: $5 million

To settle allegations it violated the Clean Water Act by altering a streambed that runs through a “former hippie village” in California, the city of Industry will pay a $5 million in restitution. Half of that amount will go toward the design and construction of a storm drain collection and water treatment system.
 
According to reports, the dredging activity—which deposited 880,000 gallons of material into the San Gabriel River—was performed by employees of a company owned by the city’s former mayor. 

The San Gabriel valley Tribune has more on this EPA enforcement action here.
 

Complete EPA Regulations Workshops – 2017 Schedule Now Available!


Managing site compliance with the many complex EPA programs that affect your business—from the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to TSCA, FIFRA, EPCRA, and more—is a major challenge. If you’re new to the field, or need an update on changing EPA rules, the Complete Environmental Regulations Workshop will help you identify the requirements that apply to your facility and make decisions that put your team in a position to succeed.


Planning for next year? The 2017 schedule is available now and includes a workshop in our new Environmental Training Center in Sparta, NJ! Register to receive a full year of Lion Membership for complete on-the-job compliance support. 

Tags: Act, Air, Clean, Clean Water Act, EPA, fines and penalties, RCRA

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Lion's course was superior to others I have taken in the past. Very clear in the presentation and the examples helped to explain the content presented.

George Bersik

Hazardous Waste Professional

Excellent. I learned more in two days with Lion than at a 5-day program I took with another provider.

Francisco Gallardo

HES Technician

Given the choice, I would do all coursework this way. In-person courses go very fast without the opportunity to pause or repeat anything.

Ellen Pelton

Chemical Laboratory Manager

The course was very well structured and covered the material in a clear, concise manner.

Ian Martinez

Hazmat Shipping Professional

The instructor created a great learning environment.

Avinash Thummadi

CAD & Environmental Manager

We have a very busy work schedule and using Lion enables us to take the course at our own time. It makes it easy for me to schedule my employees' training.

Timothy Mertes

Hazmat Shipping Professional

I will never go anywhere, but to Lion Technology.

Dawn Swofford

EHS Technician

Lion courses always set the bar for content, reference, and practical application. Membership and access to the experts is an added bonus.

John Brown, CSP

Director of Safety & Env Affairs

Very witty instructor, made the long times sitting bearable. One of the few training courses I can say I actually enjoyed.

John Hutchinson

Senior EHS Engineer

My experience with Lion classes has always been good. Lion Technology always covers the EPA requirements I must follow.

Steven Erlandson

Environmental Coordinator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

A guide to developing standard operating procedures, or SOPs, that help you select, manage, and audit your hazmat agents and contractors.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.