Lion's office will be closed on Friday, April 18. For online training support, email support@Lion.com. 
Search

EPA Eliminates Double Paperwork for Pesticide Registration Support Data

Posted on 4/9/2025 by Lion Technology Inc.

US EPA has announced a change to modernize the procedures for submitting data in support of pesticide registrations (when required under FIFRA). For the “Data Matrix” submitted by pesticide registrants—EPA Form 8570-35—EPA is establishing electronic online submissions and eliminating the need to submit paper copies of the form.

Previously, EPA required registrants to submit two paper copies—one for EPA’s use and another for public records. EPA is also removing the instructions to submit paper copies of the Data Matrix from the regulations. The Notice is effective as of March 28, 2025. 

Read the revised procedures: PR Notice 2025-1, “Revised Procedures for Citing Data to Support Pesticide Registrations.”

EPA Eliminates Double Paperwork for Pesticide Registration Support Data

First Update Since 1998 

The new rule updates the submission requirements for these pesticide registration forms for the first time since 1998. The new PR Notice was proposed in 2024 and is part of a continuing effort across the Federal government to implement electronic reporting and reduce paperwork burdens. 

EPA provided the nuts and bolts of the decision in a Notice in the Federal Register
 

In 2024, OPP received a total of 3,309 Data Matrices. The current process for submitting Data Matrices requires respondents to fill out and submit a secondary copy of EPA Form 8570–34. According to the Form’s PRA Burden statement it takes anywhere between 0.25 to 1.25 hours to fill out the form.

In 2024, the total burden sum of all respondents was a total range of 1,654.5 to 8,273 hours to fill out and submit the forms.
With this PRN, respondents will only need to submit just one form instead of two, halving the total sum burden by 50% between 827.25 and 4,136.5 hours.

"Revised Procedures for Citing Data to Support Pesticide Registrations; Notice of Availability."


More information about electronic submissions can be found on EPA's website.

About FIFRA Pesticide Registration 

All new and existing "pesticide products" must be registered with US EPA before they are distributed for sale in the US. The registration process is mandated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). The purpose is for EPA to evaluate whether a new pesticide, when used according to the manufacturer's directions, will pose an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.

When a pesticide registration is approved, the product is classified based on the danger it presents. There are three classifications: "Restricted use," "general use" and "unclassified." Individuals wishing to use "general use" or "unclassified" pesticides are required by law to follow the manufacturer's directions for use as printed on the pesticide product's label.

Most "restricted-use" pesticides may only be applied by, or under the direct supervision of, a certified applicator. Some "severely-restricted-use" pesticides can only be used in accordance with stricter terms and conditions prescribed by EPA.

2025 Environmental Regulations Training

Gain solid footing amid non-stop updates and revisions on EPA air, water, and chemical programs! Join an experienced, credentialed instructor for the next live Complete Environmental Regulations Webinar on May 15–16, 2025.

EH&S professionals who attend can identify the regulations that apply to their facility and locate key requirements to achieve compliance with the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts to EPCRA, TSCA, Superfund, and more. Prefer to train at your own pace? Try the interactive online course.

Find a Post

Compliance Archives

Lion - Quotes

Excellent job. Made what is very dry material interesting. Thoroughly explained all topics in easy-to-understand terms.

David Hertvik

Vice President

I used the IT support number available and my issue was resolved within a few minutes. I don't see anything that could have made it better.

Danny Province

EHS Professional

You blew the doors off the competition!

Stephen Bieschke

Facilities Manager

Energetic/enthusiastic! Made training enjoyable, understandable and fun!

Amanda Walsh

Hazardous Waste Professional

This is the best RCRA training I've experienced! I will be visiting Lion training again.

Cynthia L. Logsdon

Principal Environmental Engineer

The instructor was very knowledgeable and provided pertinent information above and beyond the questions that were asked.

Johnny Barton

Logistics Coordinator

The instructor was energetic and made learning fun compared to dry instructors from other training providers.

Andy D’Amato

International Trade Compliance Manager

The workshop covered a lot of information without being too overwhelming. Lion is much better, more comprehensive than other training providers.

George Alva

Manufacturing Manager

I have been to other training companies, but Lion’s material is much better and easier to understand.

Mark Abell

Regional Manager

The instructor took a rather drab set of topics and brought them to life with realistic real-life examples.

Tom Berndt

HSE Coordinator

Download Our Latest Whitepaper

This guide will help you identify 25 of the most -cited errors in RCRA training, recordkeeping, hazardous waste ID, container management, universal waste, and laboratories.

Latest Whitepaper

By submitting your phone number, you agree to receive recurring marketing and training text messages. Consent to receive text messages is not required for any purchases. Text STOP at any time to cancel. Message and data rates may apply. View our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.